The statement critiques the focus on grand jury transcripts and suggests other forms of evidence should be considered in investigations related to Trump, Epstein, and Maxwell. It questions the completeness of the evidence being discussed and implies a broader scope is necessary for transparency.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement aims to highlight potential gaps in the investigation, which could be seen as striving to do no harm by advocating for thoroughness.
[+1]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.It does not engage in personal attacks or hate speech, maintaining respect for privacy and dignity.
[+1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the focus on grand jury transcripts and suggesting a broader investigation.
[+1]