Jill Stien

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of U.S. military aid to Israel, particularly in the context of the Iron Dome and its implications for the conflict in Gaza. It critiques the allocation of resources and questions the priorities of American foreign policy, touching on broader themes of military intervention and domestic welfare.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as contributing to a divisive narrative by framing the issue in a way that may polarize opinions.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does criticize public figures, which is a normal part of public discourse.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses more on criticism than on fostering dialogue.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism of public policy and actions of public figures, but it does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses its platform to question and critique public policy, which can be seen as an attempt to influence societal priorities.
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech by engaging in a critical discussion of public policy, using the platform to express a viewpoint responsibly.