Ayanna Pressley

The statement criticizes a political action, suggesting that a bill benefits wealthy officials at the expense of struggling families. It uses strong language to convey disapproval and aims to raise awareness about the perceived negative impact of the CLARITY Act.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to highlight potential harm caused by the bill, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement seeks to promote understanding of the issue, though it uses charged language that may not foster empathy or compassion.
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism of the bill and those supporting it, but the language could be seen as a personal attack rather than constructive criticism. [-1]