In reply to:
Robert Scoble
@Scobleizer
·
53d
The statement critiques the naming conventions of AI companies, comparing them to SpaceX and suggesting that the term 'labs' is overused. It implies that the term may not reflect true innovation. The tone is somewhat dismissive and critical.
- The statement does not directly harm but could be seen as dismissive of AI companies' branding choices.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive elements, focusing instead on a negative comparison. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.