Jill Stien

Rank 36 of 47
|
Score -74

The statement expresses a strong critique of Europe, suggesting a failure to learn from historical atrocities and implying current complicity in evil acts. It uses provocative language, potentially inciting strong emotional reactions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement may cause harm by making broad generalizations about Europe and its people, potentially inciting fear or anger. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It does not respect the dignity of Europeans by implying collective guilt, which could be seen as a form of hate speech. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks empathy and understanding, as it does not consider the complexities of the issues it addresses. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, instead making sweeping accusations without offering solutions or engaging with differing perspectives. [-2]