Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement 'This. Everywhere' in response to the news about Israeli soldiers being arrested in Belgium for war crimes constitutes public discourse. It engages with a significant public issue concerning international law, human rights, and accountability for alleged war crimes. The tone suggests a call for broader accountability and justice in similar situations globally.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a need for accountability, which can be seen as promoting justice.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the importance of accountability for human rights violations. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing instead on the broader issue of accountability. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for societal betterment by calling attention to the need for accountability in war crimes. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly using the platform to discuss a significant public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.