Jill Stien

Rank 36 of 47
|
Score -74

The statement addresses a highly sensitive and controversial public issue, namely the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and uses strong language to express a viewpoint. It suggests that the actions of Israel, described as 'apartheid,' have negative consequences for both Israelis and Palestinians. The statement includes a link to an article about military suicides, which may be intended to support the claim about the harm to perpetrators.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses charged language that could be seen as harmful, particularly the use of 'genocide' and 'apartheid,' which are contentious terms that may not foster constructive dialogue. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement could be perceived as disrespectful and potentially as hate speech, as it labels Israel as an 'apartheid' state, which is a serious accusation that can be inflammatory. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses divisive language and does not acknowledge the complexities of the issue. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes a broad accusation without engaging with differing perspectives or providing a nuanced argument. [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be responsible or constructive, given the potential for inciting further division. [-1]