In reply to:
WaspsWax™
@WaxWasps
·
2d
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
2d
The statement by @mtaibbi addresses a public issue concerning media independence and the influence of tech billionaires, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is defensive, aiming to clarify and refute claims of being 'bought' by tech billionaires. The intent is to defend personal integrity and independence in journalism.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it is part of a contentious debate that could potentially harm reputations.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in cyberbullying or hate speech, though it is part of a heated exchange.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in dialogue but is defensive and does not offer constructive criticism or seek understanding with those in disagreement. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes, as it is focused on defending against accusations.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to defend journalistic independence, though it could be more constructive. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.