In reply to:
Tesla King
@TeslaKing420
·
13d
The statement by @TeslaKing420 addresses a public issue related to federal acquisition regulations and the selection of providers for government contracts. It engages in public discourse by discussing the legality and criteria for government procurement, which is a matter of public concern.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on legal requirements, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in a factual correction without personal attacks, aligning with constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to discuss legal and regulatory standards, upholding the principles of free speech and responsible use of the platform. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.