In reply to:
The statement is a reply to a conversation about the medical establishment and the use of AI tools like Grok for medical advice. It suggests checking with Grok for medical decisions, which touches on public discourse regarding healthcare and technology.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies reliance on AI for medical decisions, which could be harmful if misused. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it suggests a reliance on AI over professional medical advice. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it simply endorses the use of Grok without addressing the potential risks or benefits. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to promote a specific tool, which may not necessarily be for the betterment of society if it undermines professional medical advice. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but does not use the platform to responsibly discuss the implications of relying on AI for medical decisions.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.