+4
In reply to:
Robert Scoble
@Scobleizer
·
27d
Simon Pollock (née Tesla Light Shows)
@Teslalightshows
·
29d
The statement is part of a conversation about Tesla light shows, disputing a claim about the company's stance on the project. It addresses a specific issue related to Tesla's product features and corporate decisions, which can be considered public discourse as it involves a public figure and a well-known company.
- The statement does not cause harm and is a factual rebuttal. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy and does not engage in harassment. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing evidence against a claim. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the disagreement without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.