In reply to:
David Shapiro ⏩
@DaveShapi
·
28d
Scott Santens
@scottsantens
·
28d
The statement 'True' is a simple agreement with @DaveShapi's argument in favor of UBI, which is part of a broader discussion on the topic. The conversation involves differing opinions on UBI, with references to the Dunning-Kruger effect to critique opponents' understanding. The tone is somewhat dismissive towards those who oppose UBI, suggesting they lack understanding.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but is part of a conversation that includes dismissive language towards opponents.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it aligns with a dismissive tone towards those with opposing views. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The conversation lacks constructive dialogue, as it includes ad hominem implications about opponents' understanding. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.