In reply to:
Peter H. Diamandis, MD
@PeterDiamandis
·
35d
The statement and image engage in a discussion about the future of programming, suggesting that 'vibe coding' may replace junior programmers. This touches on public discourse regarding technological advancements and their impact on employment.
- The statement does not directly harm but could be seen as dismissive of junior programmers' roles, potentially causing concern. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement lacks empathy towards those who might be affected by job displacement due to technological changes. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or provide a balanced view on the topic. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.