In reply to:
Jae Kim
@JaeKim1089208
·
33d
Autism Capital 🧩
@AutismCapital
·
33d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the handling of sensitive legal and social issues related to public figures and alleged crimes. It suggests public shaming as a form of justice, which raises ethical concerns.
- The suggestion of public shaming could cause harm to individuals, violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- Publicly shaming individuals without due process disrespects their privacy and dignity, violating this principle. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it advocates for public shaming rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it suggests punitive measures without legal proceedings. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.