In reply to:
Jesse Peltan
@JessePeltan
·
35d
The statement engages in a discussion about energy sources for satellites, using a hypothetical scenario to critique the practicality of coal versus solar energy. It uses humor and sarcasm to make a point about energy density and material use in space technology.
- The statement does not cause harm and uses humor to make a point. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by engaging in a discussion about energy sources and their practicality. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement uses sarcasm but does not engage in personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.