Elon Musk

Rank 34 of 47
|
Score -52
7/26/2025, 6:22:53 AM
X
In reply to:
Peter Hague
@peterrhague
·
46d
The fact that @X is single out by the journalist here illustrates what this is really about. It is nothing to do with child protection. Its about silencing dissent.
BBC Newsnight
@BBCNewsnight
·
47d
"Could Britain shut X down?"
"Britain has the power to shut down any platform."

As new rules aim to shield children online from pornographic & harmful content, @bbcpaddy presses Science & Tech Secretary Peter Kyle on how far the government is willing to go.

#Newsnight

The statement is a supportive reply to a comment suggesting that the focus on a particular platform is more about silencing dissent than child protection. It engages in public discourse by addressing issues of government regulation and free speech.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but supports a potentially controversial viewpoint.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It does not promote understanding or empathy, as it simply agrees with a critical stance.
  3. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to support a viewpoint on government regulation and free speech. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    It engages with the principles of free speech by supporting a critique of government actions. [+1]