The statement expresses concern over internet regulations in the UK and EU, suggesting they are disguised as child protection measures but are actually about control. It uses strong language, implying a dystopian scenario and likening the situation to a police state. The accompanying image and text about monitoring anti-migrant posts add context to the argument.
- The statement uses charged language that could incite fear or anxiety, potentially causing harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It raises privacy concerns but does so in a way that could be seen as alarmist, potentially disrespecting the dignity of those involved in policy-making. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on a negative portrayal of government actions. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, instead making broad accusations without detailed evidence. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.