Jill Stien

Rank 39 of 47
|
Score -84

The statement is a critique of the humanitarian situation in Gaza, specifically addressing the actions of the Israeli government and calling for international intervention. It is a part of a larger conversation about the humanitarian crisis and the need for unimpeded access to aid.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight the harm caused by inadequate aid efforts, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm by advocating for better solutions. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the use of the term 'genociders' could be seen as inflammatory and potentially disrespectful. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement seeks to promote understanding and empathy by informing the public about the dire situation and urging action. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks but uses strong language that could hinder constructive dialogue. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to advocate for humanitarian access and accountability, aiming for societal betterment. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech to raise awareness about a critical issue, but the strong language used could be seen as lacking in responsibility and integrity. [-1]