In reply to:
Jeffery Mead
@the_jefferymead
·
49d
The statement questions the legitimacy of a protest by suggesting it is a paid attack, implying a lack of genuine support. It dismisses the protestors' actions and motives without evidence, potentially undermining constructive dialogue.
- The statement could be seen as dismissive and potentially harmful by questioning the protestors' legitimacy without evidence, which may not align with striving to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By suggesting the protestors are paid without evidence, it may not fully respect their dignity and could be seen as a form of harassment. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it dismisses the protestors' actions without addressing their concerns. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.