Jill Stien

Rank 39 of 47
|
Score -84

The statement critiques the actions of German police in Berlin, suggesting a contradiction between the stated purpose of militarization in Europe and the treatment of protesters. It uses strong language, such as 'assaulting' and 'genocide,' to emphasize its point.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses charged language that could be seen as inflammatory, potentially causing harm. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It may not fully respect the dignity of those involved by using strong accusations without detailed context. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement attempts to promote understanding of the situation but does so in a confrontational manner.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It engages in criticism but lacks a constructive dialogue approach, focusing on accusations. [-1]