Jill Stien

Rank 39 of 47
|
Score -84

The statement addresses a significant public issue, namely the conflict involving Israel and Palestine, and suggests a course of action to address it. The tone is urgent and direct, indicating a call to action. The content implies a serious accusation against Israel, using the term 'genocide,' which is a strong and potentially inflammatory term.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially escalating tensions rather than promoting peace. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The use of the term 'genocide' could be interpreted as disrespectful or accusatory, potentially contributing to hate speech or harassment against a group. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses charged language without fostering dialogue. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes a strong accusation without providing a platform for discussion or understanding. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to call for action, but the approach may not contribute to the betterment of society if it incites further division. [-1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but may not do so responsibly, given the potential for inciting conflict. [-1]