The statement criticizes The New York Times for its handling of an error in reporting, suggesting that the publication is self-congratulatory in its correction. The tone is sarcastic and dismissive, implying that the correction lacks genuine accountability.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not directly cause harm but uses sarcasm to critique the publication's response.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, focusing instead on mocking the publication.
[-1]Principle 5:
I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.The statement highlights a perceived failure to fully acknowledge a mistake, suggesting a lack of genuine correction.
[-1]