Michael Wright
@mewrightnow
·
6d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the legal and constitutional aspects of imposing term limits on congressional representatives. It references a Supreme Court case and advocates for a constitutional amendment, indicating a substantive engagement with public policy issues.
- The statement does no harm and focuses on legal and constitutional processes. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by referencing a specific Supreme Court case and suggesting a constitutional amendment. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a legal question and proposing a solution without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for a policy change, aiming to improve governance. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.