Joseph A. Ladapo, MD, PhD
@FLSurgeonGen
·
31d
The statement and the referenced conversation engage in public discourse by addressing public health policies and the credibility of a medical organization, which are significant societal issues.
- The statement criticizes a medical organization, which could potentially harm its reputation, but it does not use overtly harmful language. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does question the credibility of a professional organization, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it takes a confrontational stance without offering constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement criticizes the organization without engaging in personal attacks, but it lacks constructive criticism or dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech by expressing a critical opinion on public health policies, but it could be more responsible by fostering a more balanced discussion.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.