Ayanna Pressley

Rank 3 of 47
|
Score 253

The statement criticizes the discontinuation of the IRS's Direct File tool, attributing its removal to the Trump Administration and suggesting it benefits corporations like TurboTax at the expense of taxpayers. The tone is critical and accusatory, aiming to highlight perceived corporate influence over public policy.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm individuals but criticizes a policy decision, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, as it focuses on policy critique rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding of the issue by highlighting the impact of the policy change on taxpayers, aligning with promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or criticism with those in disagreement, as it attributes blame without inviting discussion, slightly violating this principle. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to raise awareness about a public issue, aligning with using influence for societal betterment. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech to critique a policy decision, aligning with responsible use of a platform. [+1]