Reposted by Ron DeSantis
Alachua Chronicle
@AlachuaChronic1
·
11d
The statement and conversation engage in public discourse by addressing public spending and taxation in Gainesville. The tone is assertive, suggesting a critical view of the city's financial management. The intent is to highlight perceived inefficiencies and promote fiscal responsibility.
- The statement aims to address public spending issues, which could be seen as striving to do no harm by advocating for taxpayer savings. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement lacks empathy and understanding towards the roles of the Chief Climate Officer and Office of Equity & Inclusion, potentially undermining their importance. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of public spending but does not engage in personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.