Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement is an opinion on the effectiveness of President Trump compared to past presidents, specifically in terms of legislative achievements. It engages in public discourse by addressing the performance of a public figure in a political context.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be polarizing due to its strong opinion, which might provoke strong reactions from both supporters and detractors of Trump.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on asserting an opinion rather than fostering dialogue.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It presents an opinion based on perceived achievements. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to express a political opinion, which is a responsible use of free speech. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.