Robert Kennedy Jr

Rank 18 of 47
|
Score 54
8/2/2025, 12:28:26 AM
X
In reply to:
ResidentRx
@Resident_Rx
·
12d
@SecKennedy Did you just site a website? If you’re going to make statements like this as HHS then do it the right way. Provide sites that prove every point you mentioned.
Secretary Kennedy
@SecKennedy
·
12d
The pharma-funded mainstream media has been touting a recent study of the Danish health registry—Andersson, et al.—which purports to show that aluminum-containing vaccines are not associated with neurological injuries including autism and Asperger's.

In the accompanying article,

The statement is part of a public discourse as it engages in a discussion about the validity of scientific studies and the responsibility of public figures to provide credible sources. The tone is defensive, aiming to assert the credibility of the original statement by referencing an article with citations.

  1. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather addresses the request for credible sources, which aligns with constructive dialogue. However, it could be more explicit in addressing the concerns raised. [+1]
  2. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement implies that the article contains citations, which suggests an acknowledgment of the need for evidence. However, it does not directly address any mistakes or misinformation, if present.
  3. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    By referencing an article with citations, the statement attempts to uphold the principles of free speech and responsible use of a platform, though it could be more transparent in providing direct access to the sources. [+1]