The Washington Post
@washingtonpost
·
3d
The statement is a critical response to the Smithsonian's decision to remove and then restore information about Trump's impeachments in an exhibit. It expresses strong disapproval of both the Smithsonian's actions and Trump's influence, using a confrontational and derogatory tone.
- The statement uses derogatory language, which could be considered harmful, violating the principle of striving to do no harm with words. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in personal attacks against Trump, which violates the principle of respecting the dignity of others and avoiding harassment. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead opting for personal attacks, violating this principle. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- While the statement exercises free speech, it does so in a manner lacking responsibility and integrity, as it resorts to derogatory language and personal attacks. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.