In reply to:
Wyatt Earp
@Wyatt_Earp_II
·
31d
The statement involves a discussion about the approval of a food product, which is a public issue related to food safety and regulatory processes. The tone is accusatory and critical, questioning the actions of the FDA and USDA regarding organic food standards.
- The statement expresses concern about potential harm from a product, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The accusatory tone towards the FDA and USDA may not fully respect the dignity of those organizations, slightly violating this principle. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it is more focused on criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, focusing instead on blame. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.