Matt Taibbi

The conversation involves a discussion about the credibility of the Steele report and its use in obtaining FISA warrants, which is a matter of public interest. However, the discourse devolves into personal attacks and offensive language, particularly in the replies. The initial statement by @mtaibbi addresses a public issue regarding the use of unverified documents in political investigations, but the subsequent replies do not engage constructively and instead resort to insults.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The use of offensive language and personal attacks violates the principle of doing no harm with words. [-2]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The conversation does not respect the dignity of others, engaging in cyberbullying and harassment. [-2]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The replies do not promote understanding or empathy, instead escalating hostility. [-2]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The discourse lacks constructive criticism and resorts to personal attacks rather than engaging with the argument. [-2]