In reply to:
kk CII
@kc11knowz
·
6d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing journalistic integrity and potential legal implications related to reporting on political matters. It questions the behavior of journalists in the context of a controversial story, implying misconduct without specific evidence.
- The statement implies wrongdoing by journalists, which could harm reputations without providing evidence, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It questions the integrity of journalists, which could be seen as disrespectful and not upholding their dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead makes accusatory remarks, which could be seen as a personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.