The statement discusses the use of anonymous sources in journalism, acknowledging their necessity in certain situations while advocating for transparency and verification. It references historical examples like Watergate to justify the use of such sources but emphasizes the importance of moving towards named sources when possible.
- The statement strives to do no harm by advocating for responsible journalism practices. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by explaining the role of anonymous sources and the need for verification. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- Engages in constructive dialogue by addressing concerns about source reliability without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.