The statement involves a discussion about the credibility and use of the Steele Dossier, touching on issues of intelligence, national security, and foreign influence. It reflects a dialogue between public figures about past decisions and assessments related to classified information and potential foreign operations.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm; it is a factual recounting of past events and decisions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by clarifying past decisions regarding the Steele Dossier and its assessment. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The dialogue is respectful and focuses on the issue at hand without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.