Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement is a report on a protest against Israel's actions, describing a large march led by Julian and Stella Assange. It uses strong language like 'slaughter, subjugation and censorship,' indicating a critical stance. The mention of police intervention and the Supreme Court suggests legal and civil rights dimensions.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as inflammatory, potentially causing harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but uses charged language that could be seen as disrespectful to certain groups. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and empathy for the Palestinian cause but does so in a confrontational manner. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It does not engage in dialogue or constructive criticism, focusing instead on a one-sided narrative. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion on a significant political issue. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.