Peter Diamandis

Rank 8 of 47
|
Score 116

The statement highlights a significant public issue by comparing the projected AI investments by Big Tech to the federal budget for education and jobs programs. It suggests a discussion on the implications of AI investments on societal priorities and resource allocation.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but raises awareness about potential societal impacts of AI investments.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement encourages understanding of the scale of AI investments and their potential impact on public funding priorities, promoting awareness and possibly empathy for those affected by such shifts. [+1]
  3. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By highlighting the disparity between AI investments and public funding, the statement uses its influence to provoke thought about societal priorities and the potential need for policy adjustments. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement responsibly uses free speech to bring attention to a significant public issue, maintaining integrity by focusing on factual projections. [+1]