Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement addresses a public issue related to social media platform policies and alleged censorship, which constitutes public discourse. It accuses Elon Musk and certain groups of repressing free speech by removing a verification badge from a UN human rights rapporteur's account.
- The statement uses charged language, such as 'Zionist harassment groups' and 'pro-genocide proxies,' which could be considered harmful and inflammatory, violating the principle of doing no harm with words. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement could be seen as disrespectful and potentially engaging in hate speech by labeling groups with derogatory terms, violating the principle of respecting the dignity of others. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but rather makes accusations and uses inflammatory language, violating the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement raises concerns about free speech and platform responsibility but does so in a manner that could be seen as lacking integrity due to its accusatory and inflammatory tone. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.