Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement is a strong critique of U.S. defense spending related to Israel's Iron Dome, expressing frustration with colleagues' votes. It uses direct language to emphasize a stance against military funding, framing it as a moral issue.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but uses strong language that could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding of a political stance, though the language may hinder empathy and compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of colleagues' actions but does not engage in personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.