Jill Stien

Rank 37 of 47
|
Score -79

The statement is a critical commentary on the actions of Israel, using strong language to describe the situation as 'genocide.' It reflects a highly charged and emotional perspective on a complex geopolitical issue, likely intended to provoke thought and discussion about the severity of the situation.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially escalating tensions rather than promoting peace or understanding. This could be considered a violation of the principle to do no harm with words. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the use of the term 'genocide' is a serious accusation that could be seen as disrespectful or inflammatory, potentially affecting the dignity of those involved. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses charged language that may polarize rather than foster dialogue. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes a strong accusation without providing a basis for discussion or understanding. [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be considered responsible or with integrity, given the potential for inflammatory impact. [-1]