Jill Stien

The statement predicts a potential conflict between Israel and Iran, suggesting motivations behind Israel's actions. It presents a critical view of Israel's military strategy and implies a lack of U.S. intervention. The tone is analytical and speculative, aiming to provoke thought and discussion on geopolitical dynamics.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement could incite fear or tension by predicting war, potentially causing harm. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It critiques a nation's actions but does not engage in hate speech or harassment.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement lacks empathy and compassion, focusing on strategic analysis rather than human impact. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   It presents a critical perspective, which can be constructive, but lacks engagement with opposing views.