Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement presents a comparison of journalist deaths across different conflicts, attributing a high number to Israel in the context of the Gaza conflict. It uses strong language, such as 'genocide,' which indicates a highly critical stance. The intent appears to be to criticize Israel's actions and highlight the dangers faced by journalists. The tone is accusatory and emotive.
- The statement could be seen as harmful due to its accusatory language and potential to inflame tensions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the dignity of those involved by using charged terms without nuanced discussion. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses strong language that may polarize rather than inform. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, as it makes strong accusations without inviting discussion. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.