Jill Stien

Rank 37 of 47
|
Score -79

The statement criticizes the United Nations Secretary-General's (UNSG) thematic offices for allegedly reporting selectively on human rights abuses based on political convenience. It suggests that these offices are influenced by powerful entities, contrasting them with independent human rights rapporteurs who report on actual abuses. The tone is critical and suggests a call for accountability and transparency in international human rights reporting.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not use harmful language but rather focuses on institutional critique, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of individuals, as it critiques institutions rather than individuals, avoiding cyberbullying or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By highlighting potential biases in reporting, the statement aims to promote understanding and accountability, aligning with the principle of promoting empathy and compassion. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of the UNSG's offices, focusing on institutional practices rather than personal attacks, aligning with the principle of constructive dialogue. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to call for betterment in human rights reporting, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech responsibly by addressing a public issue with integrity, aligning with the principle of responsible platform use. [+1]