Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the motivations behind a legislative action, specifically the TikTok ban, and its implications on free speech and government power. It suggests that the ban is not about national security but about controlling speech, which is a significant public issue.
- The statement does not directly harm but raises concerns about potential harm to free speech.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by questioning the motives behind the ban, encouraging critical thinking. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of government actions, avoiding personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- It uses influence to question government actions, potentially contributing to societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by challenging actions perceived as limiting it. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.