Jill Stien

Rank 37 of 47

Score -79

Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻

Important ruling.

Antitrust academia is rife with undisclosed funding from big tech and other business interests. Good for courts to demand it be exposed so we can distinguish between scholarship and corporate advocacy.

Luke Goldstein

@lukewgoldstein

21d

Judge says Amazon must disclose its research funding to economists, academics and think tanks as part of a class action lawsuit.

Grifters are on notice. Clock is ticking.

8/19/2025, 8:14:04 PM

The statement addresses the issue of transparency in academic funding, particularly concerning antitrust research and its potential influence by corporate interests. It supports the court's decision to demand disclosure of funding sources, suggesting this will help differentiate genuine scholarship from corporate advocacy.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement aligns with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for transparency, which can prevent misleading information from influencing public discourse. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
It promotes understanding and transparency, which can lead to more informed public discussions about antitrust issues. [+1]
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
The statement uses its platform to advocate for societal betterment by calling for accountability and transparency in academic research. [+1]