Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement is a critique of U.S. foreign policy regarding Ukraine, suggesting ulterior motives behind the U.S. involvement. It questions the authenticity of promoting democracy and implies economic and strategic interests as the primary drivers. The tone is critical and calls for an end to the war, which is a public issue.
- The statement does not directly harm others but could be seen as undermining efforts to support Ukraine, potentially affecting public perception negatively. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticism without offering constructive solutions or fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue or engagement with opposing views, focusing instead on a critical narrative. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to call for an end to the war, which could be seen as aiming for societal betterment, but it lacks a balanced perspective.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech and uses the platform to express a critical view, but it could be more responsible by providing a more nuanced analysis.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.