Reposted by Speaker Mike Johnson
The statement expresses support for a policy related to border security, specifically the enhancement of the southern border wall. It aligns with public discourse as it addresses a significant societal issue: immigration and border security.
- The statement does not directly cause harm with words, but the topic of border security can be polarizing and may indirectly contribute to divisive discourse.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion towards immigrants, as it focuses on deterrence rather than addressing the complexities of immigration. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it lacks constructive dialogue with those who may disagree with the policy.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to support a specific policy, which the speaker believes is for the betterment of society, though this is subjective and contested. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to express a political stance, though the responsibility and integrity of the message depend on one's perspective on the issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.