The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the legal and policy implications of the 2009 EPA decision, specifically the endangerment finding. It invites discussion on the origins and consequences of this decision, which is a significant public issue.
- The statement does not cause harm and encourages a discussion on a public policy issue. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by exploring the legal soundness and consequences of the EPA decision. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement invites constructive dialogue by questioning the legality of the decision without engaging in personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.