Matt Taibbi

The statement 'So you eat shit for breakfast?' is part of a series of exchanges that devolve into personal attacks and insults rather than substantive engagement with the public issue initially raised about government surveillance and prosecutorial actions. The tone is confrontational and derogatory, lacking any constructive dialogue or meaningful contribution to the public discourse.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words, as it is intended to insult and provoke rather than engage constructively. [-2]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not respect the dignity of others and engages in a form of cyberbullying by using derogatory language. [-2]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement fails to engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead resorting to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments. [-2]