The statement criticizes the Trump administration's decision to review visa holders, suggesting it is an act of harm and fear-mongering. It implies a negative impact on communities and questions the administration's motives.
- The statement suggests that the administration's actions are harmful, but it does not directly use harmful language itself.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does imply negative intentions of the administration.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote empathy for visa holders by highlighting their contributions to communities. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue with those in disagreement and implies negative motives without direct evidence. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for the rights and dignity of visa holders, aiming for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech to critique a public policy, using the platform responsibly to raise awareness. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.