In reply to:
Dr Harambe's Ghost
@rev_felix
·
168d
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
168d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing legal implications and societal norms around flag burning and hate crime enhancements. It addresses the legality of burning one's own property versus committing acts that are considered hate crimes.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but discusses actions that could be harmful if done with malicious intent.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement attempts to clarify legal distinctions, which can promote understanding, but it lacks empathy towards those affected by hate crimes. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a factual discussion without personal attacks, maintaining a constructive tone. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.